Magical Thinking.
My artistic practice may well be the
unconscious expression of a form of magical thinking rooted in my early
interest in the occult and alchemy. Such interests permeated Renaissance
humanism and probably arose due to a revived interest in Neoplatonism. According
to Philip Ball,
‘… the
Neoplatonic universe is organised according to principles of correspondence,
for example so that certain plants and metals are associated with particular
planets that govern their behaviour in an invisible conspiracy of sympathies.’
Philip Ball, Invisible: The Dangerous Allure of the Unseen (London: The Bodley Head, 2014), 20.
He also writes that,
‘These relationships were often revealed
in the outward forms of nature: they could be read literally from the surface
of things.’
Philip Ball, Invisible: The
Dangerous Allure of the Unseen (London: The Bodley Head, 2014), 20.
Such correspondences form the basis for
sympathetic or natural magic. I was fascinated by the systems of
correspondences in which different substances, plants and minerals were aligned
to certain planetary influences based on a form of sympathy or similarity.
Later I became interested in alchemy and early herbal medicine in which the
same systems of correspondences were also at work.
After reading Carl Gustav Jung’s Psychology and Alchemy, which I came
across in a second-hand book shop, I felt as though I had been given the keys
to a silent language of alchemical images. A language also rooted in a system
of correspondence. Slowly I began to immerse myself in philosophy and mysticism
and developed an interest in Frankfurt School theory which has a marked
antipathy to the work of Jung. I forgot my earlier interest in sympathetic
magic and alchemy, although I have always thought of art as a form of alchemy
due to its ability to effect material transformations.
I then came across the writings of
Walter Benjamin and was completely entranced. I now realise that this is due to
his ability to perceive correspondences, in Peter Demetz words,
‘… in an age
without magic...’
Peter Demetz, “Introduction,” in Reflections:
Essays, Aphorisms, Autobiographical Writings, ed. Peter Demetz (Boston and
New York: Mariner Books, 2019), XXII.
Peter Demetz suggests that for Walter
Benjamin,
‘It is man’s
mimetic faculty in the widest sense that brings together what seems split and
divided; the wholeness of the universe is sustained… by “natural
correspondences” that in turn stimulate and challenge man to respond by
creating analogies, similarities, something that is akin.’
Peter Demetz, “Introduction,” in Reflections: Essays, Aphorisms,
Autobiographical Writings, ed. Peter Demetz (Boston and New York: Mariner
Books, 2019), XXII.
The magical bond within my own artistic practice appears to be a resemblance or similarity, that evokes the original image first translated into an artwork many years ago.
‘The hypothesis
of substitutability… is a mode of magical reasoning because it asserts the
identity of like to like, behind the deceptive screen of experience. Art, too,
is a manipulation of the similarities and identities proposed by the
substitutional model of production. Art, therefore, cannot be understood as an
enlightened successor to magic.’
Alexander Nagel and Christopher Wood, Anachronic Renaissance (New York: Zone Books, 2010), 11.
Comments
Post a Comment